The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) released a study in October which concluded; “…carriers using PSP reduced their crash and driver OOS rates over the general carrier population.”
What is PSP? The Pre-Employment Screening Program (PSP) was launched on May 11, 2010, and is a voluntary program that enables motor carriers to obtain five years of crash data and three years of inspection data on prospective new hires. The system is specifically designed to help determine whether a driver applicant should be hired by the carrier.
So the question has lingered since the introduction of PSP — would its use make a difference in results?
From the study:
Since the mission of FMCSA is to reduce crashes, injuries, and fatalities involving commercial motor vehicles (CMVs) and FMCSA data indicate that many crashes are due to driver error, the impacts PSP has on the safety performance of drivers and the motor carrier industry is of particular interest to the Agency.
The methodology examines crash rates and driver-related out-of-service (OOS) rates of the portion of the motor carrier population using PSP. Safety performance of these carriers is compared for a 12-month period prior to and 12 months after the start of using PSP. These data are then compared to a control group of motor carriers that did not use PSP.
FMCSA’s analysis determined that both the PSP group and the control group (non-PSP) experienced a decline in crashes in all size classes. However, the motor carriers using PSP witnessed a greater decline in crash rates over the non-PSP group in the four size classes. After adjusting the crash rate improvement of the PSP group by removing the control group effects, the PSP group still showed improvement in all four size classes (although statistical significance was shown in only two size classes). The overall adjusted improvement in the crash rates for the PSP group, across all size classes, was statistically significant (see Table 1). The PSP group also experienced a decrease in driver OOS rates in all size classes. When adjusted for control group effects, this improvement in driver OOS rates was still statistically significant in all size classes.
So the answer is, YES, carriers using PSP seem to have done a better job in qualifying and selecting candidates that perform better on the job. Interestingly the use of PSP is steadily increasing, too. “Currently, there are about 35,000 PSP users making about 70,000 requests per month.”
As reported in an article (click here) at truckinginfo.com, the specific results were impressive:
“The overall adjusted improvement in the crash rates for the PSP group, across all size classes, was statistically significant,” said the report.
Overall it found crash rates declined 8% for carriers while driver OOS violations fell 17.2% for fleets using PSP, as opposed to those who haven’t
Declines in crash rates were even bigger for carriers who have between 6 and 20 drivers, falling 20.6%, and those with between 21-100 drivers, declining 21.1%.
FMCSA says the 12.4% decline in the crash rates with trucking operations that have 1 and 5 drivers, and a drop of 3.4%, for those with more than 100, are not statistically significant.
Declines in the driver OOS rates for carriers using PSP as opposed to those not using it, ranged between 10.1% for those with 21 to 100 drivers, to as much as 18.3% for those with between 1 and 5 drivers.
Most carriers use the system to verify or validate that the candidate accurately reports information about past OOS and crash data on their applications. Some even use the data to help validate prior employer information and such. Again, from the report:
- The motor carriers that responded obtained a PSP report on every driver they
hired. The most frequent use of the report, as described by the carriers FMCSA queried, is to assure that drivers are accurately reporting all information on their applications, and not omitting places of employment or crashes.
- Violations in the PSP report for pre-trip inspections, logbooks, and speeding were high on the list of concerns and were generally believed to be a better indication of a driver’s safety performance rather than violations that the driver had little direct influence to avoid.
Motor carriers responded that they can also observe if drivers have worked for companies with poor safety ratings in the past.
All in all, the combination of screening and selection methods available to motor carriers seems to be enhanced greatly when using PSP consistently. The combination of MVR, previous employer checks and PSP data can be insightful — SafetyFirst is able to provide PSP data and MVRs from all 50 states. Let us know if you’d like more information on our driver risk profiling services, online training or GPS platforms.
The FMCSA report concludes with this observation:
“Anecdotally, companies that use PSP think the program has value, they use PSP for all of their hires, and they plan to continue using PSP. These companies tend to believe drivers with favorable PSP data are more in demand and, potentially, more marketable and valuable.”
A slide show summarizing the report is available by CLICKING HERE.