In 2005 and 2011, ATRI provided a ground-breaking study of the connection between violations and increased crash risk (Click Here).
Having studied more than a half-million driver records, the analysis was incontrovertible and carries powerful implications for driver safety supervisors, managers and directors.
In short, when a driver receives a violation, the likelihood of a crash also goes up by a specific factor.
We’ve also seen a connection between tighter MVR profiles and decreased crash numbers:
“As recently reported at a fleet safety conference, two similar fleets had chosen to use the same standard for MVR review — exclude violations greater than 36 months old and allow for a combination of three violations and one preventable crash before suspending driving privileges. One of these fleets tightened their standard to two violations and one crash during the most recent 24 months and saw a five point reduction in collisions (from 22% of their fleet vehicles involved in a crash per year to 17% of their vehicles involved in a crash) and $2 million in savings.” (click here for full coverage)
Now our question to progressive fleet teams is this — are you benchmarking your driver profile results against national trends in violations to assess relative crash risk?
Consider this table (above) and how your individual drivers stack up against national averages. IF your drivers have a greater share of violations than the average, what would you do to step up your performance monitoring or refresher coaching?
- Could this data be used against you in a Negligent Supervision lawsuit?
- Is your defense going to be proactive and demonstrate that you actively monitor this data and assign coaching, education, monitoring resources or to claim “we didn’t know“? (not knowing is never a realistic defense)
If you’re using an automated MVR solution to pull in MVR data and profile it, you should be considering:
- whether the ACD code tables are up to date (many providers haven’t updated their code lists in years and can’t even post a texting violation properly!)
- whether your data can be exported to spreadsheet for analysis against national records like the table presented above, or whether your provider can automatically provide a comparison on a “driver-by-driver basis” against such public data
- whether your MVR profiling efforts should include other proactive, leading indicators of performance such as GPS alerts, how’s my driving alerts, or even camera in cabin video analysis.
- how you compare actual MVR results to your own loss data to validate the ATRI study and take action on “at-risk” drivers to reduce collisions
- how to link your MVR (ACD Codes) to refresher training modules to document immediate action taken on all drivers (who show a change in results) each time their MVR is obtained.
Of course, it may be easier to simply use our plug-n-play E-DriverFile system, Safety Hotline Program and “SafetyZone” LMS to handle these issues for you. We work with the nation’s largest fleets (of CMVs and non-regulated vehicles, too!) to help manage risk, safety and results. We also maintain an “in-network” system of relationships with more than 75 insurance providers who use our services with their select, targeted clients.